<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FreshDV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freshdv.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freshdv.com</link>
	<description>Serving up fresh, crispy news and views for creators and consumers of digital video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:27:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Necessity is the Mother of Invention (or, Whoops, We Forgot Something) by Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/05/necessity.html#comment-316353</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4546#comment-316353</guid>
		<description>Great solutions; it&#039;s always good to see how people work around issues that come up during shoots</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great solutions; it&#8217;s always good to see how people work around issues that come up during shoots</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FS700 Dynamic Range, Noise, and Slow Motion Test Footage by Matthew Jeppsen</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/05/fs700-test-footage.html#comment-316323</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Jeppsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 15:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4542#comment-316323</guid>
		<description>@Charles Are you referring to the de-saturated tones?

-MJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Charles Are you referring to the de-saturated tones?</p>
<p>-MJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FS700 Dynamic Range, Noise, and Slow Motion Test Footage by Charles Sanson</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/05/fs700-test-footage.html#comment-316322</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Sanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 15:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4542#comment-316322</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t understand why some videograpers like dull, murky footage. Especially when filming something as joyous as building and driving a HotRod?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t understand why some videograpers like dull, murky footage. Especially when filming something as joyous as building and driving a HotRod?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video Examples from the Blackmagic Camera by Kenneth Gooswit</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/blackmagic-camera-footage.html#comment-316281</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Gooswit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 23:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4533#comment-316281</guid>
		<description>Nice to have a fresh good promising camera camera. Better than all the so so HD-camera&#039;s like for instance Panasonic AF100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to have a fresh good promising camera camera. Better than all the so so HD-camera&#8217;s like for instance Panasonic AF100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zoom H4n vs. Tascam DR-100mkII vs Tascam DR-40 by Larry Rizzutti</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/audio-recorder-shootout.html#comment-316275</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Rizzutti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4531#comment-316275</guid>
		<description>Been using a Zoom H2 for a couple of years now, both as a field recorder,and as an external mic on my cameras, I have been nothing less than pleased with the performance and durability of that unit. I purchased the Zoom back when the H2 and H4 were the only units they had, I have
been thinking of getting a second unit as I am now using more than one camera, and these recorders are far better than  the mics in my cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been using a Zoom H2 for a couple of years now, both as a field recorder,and as an external mic on my cameras, I have been nothing less than pleased with the performance and durability of that unit. I purchased the Zoom back when the H2 and H4 were the only units they had, I have<br />
been thinking of getting a second unit as I am now using more than one camera, and these recorders are far better than  the mics in my cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video Examples from the Blackmagic Camera by Larry Rizzutti</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/blackmagic-camera-footage.html#comment-316269</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Rizzutti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4533#comment-316269</guid>
		<description>I am highly impressed with the footage,most shot during dusk or other low light situations negligible noise under dim conditions and the dynamic range of exposure is impressive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am highly impressed with the footage,most shot during dusk or other low light situations negligible noise under dim conditions and the dynamic range of exposure is impressive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FreshDV NAB 2012 &#8211; Blackmagic Releases a Digital Cinema Camera by Matthew Jeppsen</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-blackmagic-cinemacamera.html#comment-316265</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Jeppsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4484#comment-316265</guid>
		<description>According to Abel Cine&#039;s FOV calculator http://www.abelcine.com/fov/ Super 16mm is 11.9mm x 6.7mm and the AF100&#039;s Micro 4/3rd sensor is 17.8mm x 10mm. 

Blackmagic has stated their sensor is 15.81mm x 8.88mm. So it&#039;s quite a bit larger than S16, and slightly smaller than M4/3. Obviously there is a difference in crop factor, but I&#039;d say that M4/3 is a reasonably close comparison for general discussion of the camera.

-MJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Abel Cine&#8217;s FOV calculator <a href="http://www.abelcine.com/fov/" rel="nofollow">http://www.abelcine.com/fov/</a> Super 16mm is 11.9mm x 6.7mm and the AF100&#8242;s Micro 4/3rd sensor is 17.8mm x 10mm. </p>
<p>Blackmagic has stated their sensor is 15.81mm x 8.88mm. So it&#8217;s quite a bit larger than S16, and slightly smaller than M4/3. Obviously there is a difference in crop factor, but I&#8217;d say that M4/3 is a reasonably close comparison for general discussion of the camera.</p>
<p>-MJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Matthew Jeppsen interview with Pulse Network at NAB 2012 by Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/jeppsen-nab-interview.html#comment-316232</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4525#comment-316232</guid>
		<description>Thanks for coming by for the interview, Matt.  Great conversation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for coming by for the interview, Matt.  Great conversation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAB 2012 Canon 1DC and C500 Update by Drew Ruggles</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-canon-1dc-c500.html#comment-316227</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Ruggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4503#comment-316227</guid>
		<description>Its band Pro&#039;s new EVF

http://www.bandpro.com/products.html?page=shop.product_details&amp;flypage=flypage.tpl&amp;category_id=149&amp;product_id=216</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its band Pro&#8217;s new EVF</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bandpro.com/products.html?page=shop.product_details&#038;flypage=flypage.tpl&#038;category_id=149&#038;product_id=216" rel="nofollow">http://www.bandpro.com/products.html?page=shop.product_details&#038;flypage=flypage.tpl&#038;category_id=149&#038;product_id=216</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAB 2012 Canon 1DC and C500 Update by Drew Ruggles</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-canon-1dc-c500.html#comment-316226</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Ruggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4503#comment-316226</guid>
		<description>^second Ian&#039;s EVF comment!! ^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^second Ian&#8217;s EVF comment!! ^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAB 2012 Cinevate Sony FS100 lens mount, LED light, Simplis and Trawly by Jason Nedreau</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-cinevate-update.html#comment-316160</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Nedreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 02:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4506#comment-316160</guid>
		<description>I wish that the Cinevate guys would get their act together.  I don&#039;t care about the new products.  It would just be great if the old products they had worked.  A lot of PL lenses didn&#039;t fit on the Brevis PL mount, and those &quot;Simplis&quot;/Uno grips are so flimsy, they bend all over.  I would like to support a Canadian manufacturer, but I have to give my money to someone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish that the Cinevate guys would get their act together.  I don&#8217;t care about the new products.  It would just be great if the old products they had worked.  A lot of PL lenses didn&#8217;t fit on the Brevis PL mount, and those &#8220;Simplis&#8221;/Uno grips are so flimsy, they bend all over.  I would like to support a Canadian manufacturer, but I have to give my money to someone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAB 2012 &#8211; Andrew Kramer from VideoCoPilot, Induro Hi Hat by faronbi</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-andrew-kramer.html#comment-316158</link>
		<dc:creator>faronbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 00:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4500#comment-316158</guid>
		<description>big ups to Andrew Kramer. you have been nothing but an inspiration to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>big ups to Andrew Kramer. you have been nothing but an inspiration to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAB 2012 &#8211; Den Lennie shows us the Sony FS700 by faronbi</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-sony-fs700-den-lennie.html#comment-316157</link>
		<dc:creator>faronbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4520#comment-316157</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s a rental</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s a rental</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAB 2012 &#8211; SMAPP, the StillMotion App by faronbi</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-smapp-stillmotion.html#comment-316155</link>
		<dc:creator>faronbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4522#comment-316155</guid>
		<description>why are there no cool apps for blackberry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why are there no cool apps for blackberry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FreshDV NAB 2012 &#8211; Blackmagic Releases a Digital Cinema Camera by Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-blackmagic-cinemacamera.html#comment-316153</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4484#comment-316153</guid>
		<description>The video said it was a 4/3 sensor but isn&#039;t that different from Super 16? which is what the specs on their website suggest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The video said it was a 4/3 sensor but isn&#8217;t that different from Super 16? which is what the specs on their website suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAB 2012 Cinevate Sony FS100 lens mount, LED light, Simplis and Trawly by Charles Sanson</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-cinevate-update.html#comment-316149</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Sanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4506#comment-316149</guid>
		<description>Maybe &quot;Teutonic&quot; is the opposite of &quot;Titantic&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe &#8220;Teutonic&#8221; is the opposite of &#8220;Titantic&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAB 2012 &#8211; Adobe Premiere CS6 New Features by frank suero</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-premiere-cs6.html#comment-316147</link>
		<dc:creator>frank suero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4499#comment-316147</guid>
		<description>Jay as that matter you are 100% right.  I was talking more about how FCX use memory for it self usage.

Now with this on mind and knowing this w ehave set up a IMAC just for Video editing.  I know many, many editors that in their editing machines they do not even put internet on it, just to keep the focus of the tasks that the machine have been intended for.

A imac at the studio is 16GB and runs like  like a charm, nothing else is been done while editing, nothing else, just the stuff that it is related to the project.

Good find any way about this comment about the Apple support page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay as that matter you are 100% right.  I was talking more about how FCX use memory for it self usage.</p>
<p>Now with this on mind and knowing this w ehave set up a IMAC just for Video editing.  I know many, many editors that in their editing machines they do not even put internet on it, just to keep the focus of the tasks that the machine have been intended for.</p>
<p>A imac at the studio is 16GB and runs like  like a charm, nothing else is been done while editing, nothing else, just the stuff that it is related to the project.</p>
<p>Good find any way about this comment about the Apple support page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAB 2012 &#8211; Adobe Premiere CS6 New Features by Jay Windland</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-premiere-cs6.html#comment-316146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Windland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4499#comment-316146</guid>
		<description>@ Frank - Re the memory management issues, here is one of many threads discussing the problem:

https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3674752?start=0&amp;tstart=0

Whether it comes from FCPX or Lion, the crux of it is that FCPX tries to use every ounce of RAM physically present, thus leaving none for the system itself to operate, and chokes basic performance as soon as you have a marginally complex project . If you watch your system monitor, the inactive memory portion of the pie chart just grows. My understanding is that it is failing to release memory well beyond the point that the task is completed. There are workarounds. You can purge memory manually, hide events, etc, but in the end they are workarounds. Adobe apps let you allocate specific amounts of ram to specific apps. That&#039;s no longer possible with FCPX.

Probably the most perplexing thing though is that in every discussion of these issues, someone like yourself pops in and says &quot;what issue?&quot; and seems to not experience any trouble with similarly configured systems. And I believe you too, so it is still an unresolved issue, as it doesn&#039;t appear to be uniformly present and nowhere has it uniformly been resolved.

With all that being said, I&#039;ve burned a lot of time (and hence money) with FCPX, and the new PPro has now included some of the essential features I love about FCPX (stabilizing for instance), so my interest is piqued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Frank &#8211; Re the memory management issues, here is one of many threads discussing the problem:</p>
<p><a href="https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3674752?start=0&#038;tstart=0" rel="nofollow">https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3674752?start=0&#038;tstart=0</a></p>
<p>Whether it comes from FCPX or Lion, the crux of it is that FCPX tries to use every ounce of RAM physically present, thus leaving none for the system itself to operate, and chokes basic performance as soon as you have a marginally complex project . If you watch your system monitor, the inactive memory portion of the pie chart just grows. My understanding is that it is failing to release memory well beyond the point that the task is completed. There are workarounds. You can purge memory manually, hide events, etc, but in the end they are workarounds. Adobe apps let you allocate specific amounts of ram to specific apps. That&#8217;s no longer possible with FCPX.</p>
<p>Probably the most perplexing thing though is that in every discussion of these issues, someone like yourself pops in and says &#8220;what issue?&#8221; and seems to not experience any trouble with similarly configured systems. And I believe you too, so it is still an unresolved issue, as it doesn&#8217;t appear to be uniformly present and nowhere has it uniformly been resolved.</p>
<p>With all that being said, I&#8217;ve burned a lot of time (and hence money) with FCPX, and the new PPro has now included some of the essential features I love about FCPX (stabilizing for instance), so my interest is piqued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAB 2012 &#8211; Adobe Premiere CS6 New Features by frank suero</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-premiere-cs6.html#comment-316145</link>
		<dc:creator>frank suero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4499#comment-316145</guid>
		<description>FCX with the Black-MAgic hardware is allowing External Monitoring.  They said that in the next update it will be there.

Also MEMORY MANAGEMENT PROBLEM? I am not sure if I understood well but if Jay Windland is saying that FCX have problem allocating memory I will not agreed on that.  A week ago on a shooting we need it to show a ruff cut to the customer right on the spot on a MBP and with only 8 GB of RAM we did a 8 minutes preview, My Imac manage FCX like butter, seriouslly, it all depends on teh codec you are working on. I will make every single file to PRO RESS 422 and my limited IMAG is making things faster them never did with FC7, we are not a big studio but for the jobs we do for the christian community and a couple of christian movies (45 minutes each) we are just fine.

Also on the Copy part of my comment, I have Premier CS5 and FCX, I prefer premier for quick simple 30Seconds commercials, but for longer projects Final Cut is a much better platform, all that metadata at the end if used correctly is a bless to work with, render time and the way it works with Proxy&#039;s is a killer.

God bless you all guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FCX with the Black-MAgic hardware is allowing External Monitoring.  They said that in the next update it will be there.</p>
<p>Also MEMORY MANAGEMENT PROBLEM? I am not sure if I understood well but if Jay Windland is saying that FCX have problem allocating memory I will not agreed on that.  A week ago on a shooting we need it to show a ruff cut to the customer right on the spot on a MBP and with only 8 GB of RAM we did a 8 minutes preview, My Imac manage FCX like butter, seriouslly, it all depends on teh codec you are working on. I will make every single file to PRO RESS 422 and my limited IMAG is making things faster them never did with FC7, we are not a big studio but for the jobs we do for the christian community and a couple of christian movies (45 minutes each) we are just fine.</p>
<p>Also on the Copy part of my comment, I have Premier CS5 and FCX, I prefer premier for quick simple 30Seconds commercials, but for longer projects Final Cut is a much better platform, all that metadata at the end if used correctly is a bless to work with, render time and the way it works with Proxy&#8217;s is a killer.</p>
<p>God bless you all guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAB 2012 &#8211; Adobe Premiere CS6 New Features by Jay Windland</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2012/04/nab-2012-premiere-cs6.html#comment-316141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Windland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/?p=4499#comment-316141</guid>
		<description>@Nels - Points taken, and no, FCPX does not currently have a source monitor, though the next &quot;upgrade&quot; is supposed to put it back. It&#039;s kinda silly. CS6 looks nice though. Hopefully the big three A&#039;s (possibly four now) will drive one another to improve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nels &#8211; Points taken, and no, FCPX does not currently have a source monitor, though the next &#8220;upgrade&#8221; is supposed to put it back. It&#8217;s kinda silly. CS6 looks nice though. Hopefully the big three A&#8217;s (possibly four now) will drive one another to improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

