Archive for April, 2011

Speak the Same Language as your Actors

Here’s a fascinating article on directing actors. It deals with getting you on the same communication channel as your talent, and there is excellent advice here.

Here are some of the more important parts of the actor’s language that every director should know.
(1) Scene Objectives
(2) Character Objectives
(3) Text, Subtext and Context
(4) Conflict
(5) Action Verbs
(7) Obstacles
(8) Beats
(9) Permission
(10) In the Moment
(11) Listening
(12) Physical Sensation
(13) Improvisation
(14) Stakes
(15) Character Arc
(16) Back Story & Biography
(17) Business (Props, Tasks)
(18) Italian Reading

The article goes on to explain each bullet point in detail, for instance under Action Verbs they offer this advice:

“Actors need actions. Actors cannot “act” adjectives – they need verbs. So, instead of asking an actor to play it sexy, ask the actor to flirt with the other actor. This encourages the actor to engage with the other actor, rather than be focused on being sexy.”

Great stuff. Read this and pass it on.

via @frugalfilmmaker

Vincent Laforet has a blog post up announcing the new CineStyle image profile for Canon DSLRs, compliments of Technicolor. He is very complimentary of the color profile, saying:

You’ll notice a SIGNIFICANT difference in the shadow detail.
This picture will work with all Canon HDDSLRs – BUT it was clearly aimed at perfecting the 5D MKII specifically.

And from the quick before/after example he’s posted, I have to agree. Shadow detail is improved, and contrast is very low. It’s a nice, flat image look from the 5D MKII. There’s a good comparison test up on this blog that shows how the new picture profile compares with the popular Superflat profile…and the results are that the Technicolor profile handles overexposure a little more gracefully. Good to know.

You can snag a copy of the new color profile here. If you don’t have your EOS disc handy, here’s how to grab a copy of the EOS Utility. Finally, let us know what you think in the comments.

UPDATE: Here’s a short image profile test compliments of NeedCreative:

Redrock Micro updates from NAB

We didn’t make it over to the Redrock Micro booth at NAB 2011, so I was glad to see that Tony Reale at Nextwave DV did a great video segment with Brian Valente on what Redrock was showing.

Looks like they’ve got a new “Blue” pro-grade single/double-sided follow focus in the works, as well as a Micro 4/3 adapter for Canon lenses with electronics control (which I imagine borrows from their existing LiveLens tech from the adapter line). Brian also showed off a small affordable side-by-side 3D camera rig. Watch below…

Proteus Grip Sticks have your back

Need to hang some gear off your camera rig or cage? Check out Cinevate’s Grip Sticks. They are a simple, lightweight jointed arm with industry-standard 1/4-20 ends.

I’ve been using them to mount audio recorders and monitor accessories from a DSLR run-n-gun rig for a few weeks, and they work well. And since the lengths and joints are all interchangeable, with a few Grip Sticks and some imagination, you can build them out to whatever length and configuration you might need.

Here’s their creative promo video that introduces Grip Sticks, watch below…

Cinevate has always been an active supporter of the filmmaking and production community, and are a FreshDV sponsor as well. They are good people; we like what they make and we like how they do business.

Edi Schneider put together a beautifully shot behind the scenes look at the busy Zacuto & Kessler Crane booth that shows a plethora of creatives and industry personalities hanging out. Edi shot this for Zacuto, and it’s obviously a bit of an ad piece in that regard, but more than that it’s an enjoyable highlight from NAB; a little taste of the friendships and relationships formed and revisited at the show. I think you’ll enjoy it, watch below.

While in Vegas for the ridiculous schedule of covering NAB 2011, we at FreshDV somehow found the time to help out on a little side project with Next Level Pictures. There were a ton of other creatives involved, and we were proud to work with these guys on a very interesting, very hush-hush test.

Dubbed #operationNGAF, this was a creative test of the new Sony S-Log firmware in the PMW-F3. We believe this is the first release of S-Log footage from this camera, and we think it looks pretty damn good. The camera was kindly provided by Abel Cine, and a crew of talented professionals was pulled together. Kendal Miller and myself helped out by shooting a handful of Behind the Scenes interviews with the crew and some BTS footage from the heli sequence.

Here is the S-Log footage you are looking for:

World’s First Sony F3 S-Log Test from Next Level Pictures on Vimeo.

And here’s an incredible behind the scenes video, edited by the very talented Tyler Ginter:

World’s First Sony F3 S-Log Test – Behind the Scenes from Next Level Pictures on Vimeo.

I’m sick and tired. After a week of nonstop talking at NAB I have realized that there are some incredibly talented independent filmmakers out there, and they are by far in the minority. There are those people out there finding legitimate uses for the tools at hand and really using them to tell some incredible stories. However, there are far more posers than anything else. I’m fed up with Vimeo, shallow DOF, slider driven. montage sequences with credits on them masquerading as films. I’m sick of lazy, careless, pre-production, masquerading as cinema verite or so called art films. I’m completely over the pretentious arrogance put out by some co-called “filmmakers” in our industry. Now before you hang me from a tree as a warning to all who dare trespass this sacred ground, hear me out. I’m not saying these pieces don’t have warrant. I’m saying they aren’t films, get over yourself. Don’t even get me started on music videos.

So I’m not David Mullen, Rodney Charters, Roger Deakins, Robert Primes, or any of the other cinematographers whom I admire and who have an incredible body of work to stand behind. It is always a dangerous position to decry something, while aspiring to achieve something yourself. I am on a journey, a journey to learn, and absorb everything I possibly can about cinematography, and filmmaking. I want to be the best I possibly can, and often find my own ineptitude to by my weakest link. I recognize that I have not arrived, nor do I really ever hope to. Personally, I feel that the minute you quite studying your craft and learning that you should just quit. One of the things I admire most about the aforementioned cinematographers, some of whom I have had the great honor of talking with personally, is that they all espouse the same sentiment at one level or another. There is a realization that their job is ever changing, and they themselves are always building new techniques, and skills to accommodate for it. So if you will allow me I’d like to take off the facade and be brutally honest with you about myself and others I see in the field of independent filmmaking.

…ASC Manual that states that cinematography is the art and craft of the authorship of visual images for the cinema. Any processes that may affect these images are the direct responsibility of the cinematographer. It goes beyond just photography; we are responsible for the overall photographic quality of the image and how it’s used to tell the story. We work with the director and the other department heads to achieve that quality. From a production standpoint, we have three departments under our control: Camera, Electric, and Grip. Technically, “cinematography” means motion picture photography. I’m not one of those people who thinks that if you shoot digitally, it is not cinematography, it’s videography. We use the word “film” to describe movies in general regardless of their origination medium.

-DAVID MULLEN

There is a sense that anyone with a DSLR or camera of any type is either a filmmaker, director, or director of photography. Now I don’t take to task the cameras or technology for this. No, in fact each camera could in its own right be used very usefully, and to a proper end. It is the following formula that I take to task: Camera Gear+Pretty Images=Filmmaker. It is the idea of removing the thought, and creative process from the filmmaking experience and stripping it down to a rote exercise. Lets face it, a lot of the camera systems today do not necessarily require a high level of technical competence to crank out pretty images. I react to the thoughtlessness with which such so called “art” is produced. While technology is important it is not the camera that makes the film, it is the filmmaker. The democratization of camera gear into the hands of the consumer has allowed anyone and everyone to wear the title of filmmaker. But what is it that truly makes a filmmaker? Is it simply the ability to create disparate compelling images? Is it being lauded by a crowd and having a following? Perhaps the answer is more multifaceted than we allow.

I have no doubt that Roger Deakins could light and produce a much more compelling project utilizing an HVX200, than I possibly could achieve with the new Arri Alexa. Why? He understands the true art of cinematography and the visual language of the screen. He understands the art of a specific lens choice made to compress or expand a space, subtly changing or enhancing the juxtaposition of characters in a frame. He understands how to utilize camera blocking to specifically underscore and support an emotional element of the script, or story. Lighting becomes yet another decision informed by the character, and tone of the scene, and in the hands of a master such as Deakins it speaks as loud as the dialog. All of these decisions require a deep and masterfully grasp of both story and visual language. Both of these are elements I find sadly lacking in most of the work showcased by a lot of the independent film world. I will also insert here that I personally find my grasp of these elements to be rudimentary at best, and am seeking to incorporate a much deeper understanding of this into my work. Filmmaking often becomes reduced down to making default decisions on the fly that will often result in pretty images that montage well together. While on some level this works as a study of composition and lighting, I propose that it does not make a filmmaker.

I believe the devil is in the details, as they say. A film has to start out with a strong story and it has to be supported by good acting. But if you have those elements, then how you direct it, shoot it, art direct it, cut it, compose the music, can enhance that story or tell it better. You know, “Hamlet” is a great story, but that doesn’t mean a two-year-old can direct “Hamlet” just because it’s a good story. You have to have the skill of a storyteller to make a good production of “Hamlet.” So I think cinematography is one element of the storytelling process that will enhance the experience for the audience. And the audience doesn’t necessarily have to be aware of this stuff. An average person doesn’t know how to build a house and doesn’t know anything about architecture… but certainly he wants to live in a house that is well-built. He hires experts to deal with that stuff. I think the audience expects the filmmakers to be the experts in filmmaking, that the filmmakers are the ones that know about film stocks and lenses and formats so they don’t have to. They just have to enjoy the movie.

-DAVID MULLEN

While visually compelling to look at, especially from the viewpoint of another “filmmaker”, these montage pieces are often devoid of real heart, soul, and emotion. May I propose that real cinematography as an art form comes from making specific, and informed choices. These decisions can only be found as you develop a deep sense of visual language, that guides your style and direction. A strong technical proficiency then allows you to execute those decisions. Both pieces of the puzzle are needed. Know why you make every choice and begin to learn to defend your decisions. Why did you shoot a composition at a given focal length or stop? Why did you center punch or weight the subject to one side of the frame or the other? Its not that one choice is inherently right and one is wrong, but you should know why you made the decision.

Can you decide not to use the visual components in your production? No; If you ignore visual components they won’t go away. Color can be eliminated by shooting in black and white, but it’s impossible to eliminate any other visual component because they exist in everything on the screen. Even a blank screen contains the visual components of space, line, shape, tone, and movement. So the screen is never empty. Even a still photograph uses the components of rhythm and movement. Since the visual components are always on screen understanding, controlling, and using them are critical to great picture making.

-BRUCE BLOCK, A Visual Story

As you begin to question yourself and your work you will begin to develop an internal sense of style as well. Informed specific decisions should be made from lighting, camera blocking, lens selection, color, and tone all the way through. It is the only way to begin to bring cohesive style to a piece. These are things that separate out the truly great cinematographers, they have a commanding grasp of the elements, and wield them like a true artist.

Really, a cinematographer’s work is only as good as the director, really. That’s why I love working with the Coens and with Norman Jewison. They really push you to do something and you feel like you can work from a position of strength and take chances and risks. It’s hard when you’re on a film if a director doesn’t have the experience to understand the visual language involved, and there is a whole language involved. And if the director doesn’t understand that or isn’t confident enough with himself to let you, the cameraman, to take what the script requires and create the visuals it can be frustrating.

-ROGER DEAKINS

It is when I see true artist like Deakins, and Charters put such an insane level of thought and process into a shot that just comes to life on screen and breathes emotion, that I personally feel unworthy to wear the label filmmaker. I have no issue with people learning, and studying, stumbling, and fumbling along the way. I’m in the same boat, we are all learning together here. The issue I have is the level or pretentiousness and arrogance that seeks to assert this level of work as some presumed mastery of “high art”. It is at this point that I cry ,”Foul!” To do so is to completely undermine the level of true art poured out by the masters. We reduce filmmaking back to an academic shooting exercise. Come on, we are better than that. Surround yourselves with people who are better than that. We all want to aspire to be truly great, to create art, and inspire others. Can’t we let go of our egos for a moment and recognize with brutal honesty where we are in the journey? Push yourself to study your craft, dissect your decisions and choices, allow brutal feedback from those you trust, not just those will laud your incompetence as art. Learn from your mistakes, and push forward to make better informed decisions next time. Might I suggest the following exercises to improve your craft:

1. Get out and shoot a short scripted project with actors on a tight schedule. Repeat this process until you get it right. Trust me the first several times will produce nothing but crap. Doing it without a schedule doesn’t count either.

2. Do a script breakdown by visual elements and learn to plan camera coverage. Your producers will thank you.

3. Have you ever even done an overhead or lighting plot? If not do one, now. Again, be ready to defend your choices.

4. Get people you trust to absolutely rip your project apart, rip it apart yourself. A couple guys that I work with and I do a complete postmortem on almost every project we shoot. What worked, what didn’t work? Where do things need to be improved? If you don’t have those people around you drop everything and go find them right now!

5. Cut the crap. Chances are you are less than half as good as you think you are. All of us are, and that is the brutal truth. The sooner you can be honest about your weakness the sooner you can throw yourself into honestly learning to be better.

6. Learn some humility, we could all use a dose from time to time. This is especially true at when people tend to pump up and overemphasize our achievements or lack there of.

What about instinct, is there ever a place for simply doing something because it feels like the right approach? Absolutely. I have heard many great DPs say they attempted a particular shot simply because it felt like the correct approach. There is a lot to be said about that. However, I think it should flow as the exception and not the norm. The following quote by Bruce Block reiterates this:

Something new pops into your head that solves a problem. That is when instincts are great. Use them. You may never understand why your instincts were correct, but when you see the final product you know you made the right decision. But don’t let instincts fool you. Sometimes instincts are incomplete, unreliable, or wrong. Instinctual choices may only be old habits or underdeveloped ideas that sound good but are ultimately disappointing. “if you had been there, it seemed to work,” is a lame excuse for poor instinctual choice.

-BRUCE BLOCK, The Visual Story

So where does the technology come in then? Filmmaking is after all a blend of technology, collaboration, and art is it not? Let’s take a look at this quote by Deakins:

And, frankly, it’s not the technology that makes the great movies. I mean, if you went back to see Citizen Kane and you looked at it on a big screen and you looked at the quality of the image, I mean, frankly, some of it is not very…well, good’s not the right word, because technically it’s not as sharp. Some of it is very grainy. The lens quality is not as good as modern lenses. But…[Laughs] it’s still a better film than ninety-nine percent of what are made today. So, you know, it’s not just about technique and equipment.

-ROGER DEAKINS

Now don’t get me wrong, DSLRs and these other compact, single sensor cameras, offer some wonderful advantages to filmmakers. I’m a tech guy and I’m personally very excited about some of the features these tools are bringing to the table. Higher dynamic range, cleaner ISO, and higher native sensitivity, are all going to benefit our images in the long run. But we can’t allow that to be enough, we can’t stop there. We can’t allow ourselves to become lazy and make thoughtless default decisions, just because the technology allows it. Deakin’s quote above speaks so strongly to that, to me its saying craft, and content will always win the day. Know the technical advantages that the current cameras offer, combine that with a strong sense of craft and you have a recipe for success. Just please don’t get a big head about being a “filmmaker”, lose the attitude, really we are all sick of it. There are alot of people out there much more deserving who have earned it rightfully, and paid their dues. When you read a quote like the one above by Deakins, and realize he is arguably lumping his own work into that statement, it can’t help but really humble you. I mean if anyone had a right to assert here it would be him. You won’t hear much from these guys lauding their art or their work, they don’t need to talk much. They are too busy working in their field to take part in petty forum wars, or egotistical twitter arguments, they quietly hone their craft and develop their skills. Their art and stories say all that needs saying, it whispers, “I’m a filmmaker.”

Did you miss the National Association of Broadcasters Expo last week? If so, you can watch our extensive coverage of NAB here at FreshDV.

Last week the FreshDV team produced 32 videos from the NAB tradeshow floor, over 5 hours of content. This week we will also release two edited interviews that were previously broadcast live from the Teradek booth, one with Director Jason Wingrove, and one with Mitch Gross of Abel Cine. That will put us over 6 hours of edited content from NAB 2011. It’s an extensive look at the tradeshow, and we encourage you to have a look and see what’s new from the Expo.

Our NAB 2011 coverage is made possible by the kind support of Cinevate, Genus, Kessler Crane, LetusDirect, Small HD, Sorenson, CPM Film Tools, Zeiss, Ikan, OmniTracker, and Porta Brace.

You can watch all of our NAB coverage on the following two pages of posts. If you’ve enjoyed our coverage, please help us spread the word by taking two minutes of your time to recommend FreshDV to a friend on Facebook, Twitter, or your favorite video/filmmaking forum. Thank you for watching, and for all the feedback. We greatly appreciate it.

Finally, a special thanks goes out to creative Jesse Rosten, who created our snazzy lower thirds and logo sequences. You can find more info on Jesse at www.jesserosten.com.

NAB11 Kessler

At Kessler’s NAB booth, we talked to Eric Kessler about their brand new, full-featured motion control system which will be shipping soon, and also updates to the Oracle system. We also took a look at the Cineslider and the Bloom Pocket Dolly. It’s an update on what they are offering as a company, and a great overview of their extensive product line if you aren’t already familiar with it.

Kessler Crane

NAB11 Cineform

Recently, it was announced that GoPro had acquired Cineform, and would be utilizing their tech in a 3D camera. We dropped by the Cineform booth at NAB 2011 to talk to David Newman about this change for Cineform, and how that affects their pro users. Watch below.

CINEFORM

NAB11 Letus

Kendal sits down with Aaron Pinto and talks to him about what Letus Direct has been up to this year. Aaron shows off their new baseplate system customized for the AF-100, a micro 4/3 to PL Mount for the AF, a beautiful new strong arm, and their prototype of a follow focus rig. Watch below.


Letus

NAB11 LIVE with Mitch Gross

We will be broadcasting live with Mitch Gross from Able Cine from the Teradek booth at 10am PST. Should be an interesting discussion, so tune in to join us and ask your questions about all things tech at http://www.freshdv.com/live

NAB11 Cinevate

Dennis shows just how busy Cinevate has been over the past year. He shows off the Simplis rig among many other things. Bill Frakes pops in to say hello and also Patrick Moreau of StillMotion is also in the booth…Patrick walks us through one of the many builds of the Simplis rig and throws it back to Dennis who shows us the new 12 light LED panel and then the Atlas 10 FLT slider system that’s been getting great buzz. Dennis demonstrates how to adapt Cyclops to work with a small Sony field monitor, with future compatibility with other small field monitors like the SmallHD.


Cinevate_CinevateCom

NAB11 Atomos

Atomos demos the very versatile Ninja and Samurai. The Ninja comes with batteries, cables, case and more in a really compelling package.

Atomos

NAB11 Sorenson

Matt stops to talk to Eric Quanstrom about how Sorenson360 has been a great solution for FreshDV’s NAB content delivery, and we also talk about the Squeeze encoder software and Squeeze Live, a new product from Sorenson that takes the pain out of live content delivery.

SORENSON

Rodney's Adsense-Deluxe Add ons plugged in.