<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XDCAM EX1 Hands-On - Depth of Field Examples</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freshdv.com/2008/01/xdcam-ex1-hands-on-depth-of-field-examples.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2008/01/xdcam-ex1-hands-on-depth-of-field-examples.html</link>
	<description>Serving up fresh, crispy news and views for creators and consumers of digital video</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chun</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2008/01/xdcam-ex1-hands-on-depth-of-field-examples.html#comment-31396</link>
		<dc:creator>Chun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2008/01/xdcam-ex1-hands-on-depth-of-field-examples.html#comment-31396</guid>
		<description>I will be shooting for dramas and short films. What are the other benefits to using a 35mm adapter in addition to smoother bokehs? It would be great if someone could post some comparison shots, with and without a 35mm lens adapter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be shooting for dramas and short films. What are the other benefits to using a 35mm adapter in addition to smoother bokehs? It would be great if someone could post some comparison shots, with and without a 35mm lens adapter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Jeppsen</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2008/01/xdcam-ex1-hands-on-depth-of-field-examples.html#comment-31385</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Jeppsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2008/01/xdcam-ex1-hands-on-depth-of-field-examples.html#comment-31385</guid>
		<description>I think it really depends on the application and the look you want to achieve. I could see that in certain applications the EX1's increased shallow focus vs common 1/3" small-format HD camcorders would be enough to keep some from utilizing a 35mm adapter. But there are plenty of other benefits to using a 35mm adapter, like smoother bokeh rendering.

-Matt Jeppsen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it really depends on the application and the look you want to achieve. I could see that in certain applications the EX1&#8217;s increased shallow focus vs common 1/3&#8243; small-format HD camcorders would be enough to keep some from utilizing a 35mm adapter. But there are plenty of other benefits to using a 35mm adapter, like smoother bokeh rendering.</p>
<p>-Matt Jeppsen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chun</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2008/01/xdcam-ex1-hands-on-depth-of-field-examples.html#comment-31382</link>
		<dc:creator>Chun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2008/01/xdcam-ex1-hands-on-depth-of-field-examples.html#comment-31382</guid>
		<description>I take it from these tests that film lens adapters such as Redrock's M2 and Cinevate's Brevis 35 will no longer be required? If that is true, that would probably swing me from buying a HVX200 to an EX1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it from these tests that film lens adapters such as Redrock&#8217;s M2 and Cinevate&#8217;s Brevis 35 will no longer be required? If that is true, that would probably swing me from buying a HVX200 to an EX1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Jeppsen</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2008/01/xdcam-ex1-hands-on-depth-of-field-examples.html#comment-31376</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Jeppsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2008/01/xdcam-ex1-hands-on-depth-of-field-examples.html#comment-31376</guid>
		<description>Thanks Anthony! That was actually Muse.

-Matt Jeppsen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Anthony! That was actually Muse.</p>
<p>-Matt Jeppsen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajit</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2008/01/xdcam-ex1-hands-on-depth-of-field-examples.html#comment-31348</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2008/01/xdcam-ex1-hands-on-depth-of-field-examples.html#comment-31348</guid>
		<description>That is one pretty depth of field test. Also, is that from the new Radiohead cd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is one pretty depth of field test. Also, is that from the new Radiohead cd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.310 seconds -->
