<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 ISO comparison images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freshdv.com/2007/07/red-500-1000-2000-and-4000-iso-comparison-images.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2007/07/red-500-1000-2000-and-4000-iso-comparison-images.html</link>
	<description>Serving up fresh, crispy news and views for creators and consumers of digital video</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Jeppsen</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2007/07/red-500-1000-2000-and-4000-iso-comparison-images.html#comment-9599</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Jeppsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2007/07/red-500-1000-2000-and-4000-iso-comparison-images.html#comment-9599</guid>
		<description>I believe the native signal to noise ratio of the Mysterium sensor is reputed to be around 250 ASA. See &lt;a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=3039" rel="nofollow"&gt;this thread&lt;/a&gt; for more details. These being prototype cameras, that number obviously may change. For more info on ISO, ASA, and SNR in digital sensors, &lt;a href="http://www.digitalcameraclub.com.au/glossary/image_noise_asa_iso.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;here's a quick primer&lt;/a&gt;. FreshDV editor Kendal Miller also wrote a good &lt;a href="http://www.freshdv.com/2007/03/sn-ratios-demystified.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;article on signal-to-noise ratio&lt;/a&gt; not long ago. 

-Matt Jeppsen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the native signal to noise ratio of the Mysterium sensor is reputed to be around 250 ASA. See <a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=3039" rel="nofollow">this thread</a> for more details. These being prototype cameras, that number obviously may change. For more info on ISO, ASA, and SNR in digital sensors, <a href="http://www.digitalcameraclub.com.au/glossary/image_noise_asa_iso.htm" rel="nofollow">here&#8217;s a quick primer</a>. FreshDV editor Kendal Miller also wrote a good <a href="http://www.freshdv.com/2007/03/sn-ratios-demystified.html" rel="nofollow">article on signal-to-noise ratio</a> not long ago. </p>
<p>-Matt Jeppsen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2007/07/red-500-1000-2000-and-4000-iso-comparison-images.html#comment-9586</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2007/07/red-500-1000-2000-and-4000-iso-comparison-images.html#comment-9586</guid>
		<description>The 8000 ISO was simply amazing.  What is the lowest ISO on the camera?  Where would I find that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 8000 ISO was simply amazing.  What is the lowest ISO on the camera?  Where would I find that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
