<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NAB Video - Panasonic HPX-500 Hands On</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html</link>
	<description>Serving up fresh, crispy news and views for creators and consumers of digital video</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dis cephe</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-223837</link>
		<dc:creator>dis cephe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-223837</guid>
		<description>great web site.Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great web site.Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: visit</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-222222</link>
		<dc:creator>visit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 05:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-222222</guid>
		<description>Hi from New York And thanks for the web site. It was just the thing I had been looking for. It has helped me no end. Thanks again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi from New York And thanks for the web site. It was just the thing I had been looking for. It has helped me no end. Thanks again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uli Mors</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-19838</link>
		<dc:creator>Uli Mors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-19838</guid>
		<description>Hi,

IÂ´ll rent a HPX 500 today for testing!

ULI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>IÂ´ll rent a HPX 500 today for testing!</p>
<p>ULI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Hooper</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-5288</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 02:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-5288</guid>
		<description>Love the camera, just wish the native pixels was larger.  The biggest question I have is why is the Deck cost so much.  It costs more than the camera.  A lot more.  Sure tapeless is great for acquisition, but you can't keep buying hard drives.  You need to archive it to something and tape is still the best for archiving.  But with the cost of the Panasonic Deck you have to rethink your (system) purchases as to whether it is sustainable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the camera, just wish the native pixels was larger.  The biggest question I have is why is the Deck cost so much.  It costs more than the camera.  A lot more.  Sure tapeless is great for acquisition, but you can&#8217;t keep buying hard drives.  You need to archive it to something and tape is still the best for archiving.  But with the cost of the Panasonic Deck you have to rethink your (system) purchases as to whether it is sustainable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendal Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-3852</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendal Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 05:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-3852</guid>
		<description>Hi Dean,
The HPX-500 should be quite the contender!! With the falling rates of P2 technology and Sony introdusing their tapeless formats I expect to see a bigger push from Panasonic to get their P2 technology deeper into the market. I will agree with you that the last piece of the puzzle would be some solid archive solutions. I was hoping the holographic stuff at NAB would be a little further along than it is. To me if that technology was to be adapted in mass that would be a great solution for delivery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dean,<br />
The HPX-500 should be quite the contender!! With the falling rates of P2 technology and Sony introdusing their tapeless formats I expect to see a bigger push from Panasonic to get their P2 technology deeper into the market. I will agree with you that the last piece of the puzzle would be some solid archive solutions. I was hoping the holographic stuff at NAB would be a little further along than it is. To me if that technology was to be adapted in mass that would be a great solution for delivery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-3834</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 22:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-3834</guid>
		<description>Basically, the HPX 500 is the big brother of the HVX 200 and has the kind of qualities:2/3 CCDs, SD/HD, gen lock, removable lens ~ that professionals want on their cameras. I've often had people comment on my DVX 100 that it doesn't look like a professional camera and I show them footage. They are impressed!
The HPX 500 has everything you need to get great footage and no one, looking at the camera, will say it doesn't look professional!
The one problem, and it's a major one, is that many producers are not yet ready for tapeless footage. It's still a Beta tape world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, the HPX 500 is the big brother of the HVX 200 and has the kind of qualities:2/3 CCDs, SD/HD, gen lock, removable lens ~ that professionals want on their cameras. I&#8217;ve often had people comment on my DVX 100 that it doesn&#8217;t look like a professional camera and I show them footage. They are impressed!<br />
The HPX 500 has everything you need to get great footage and no one, looking at the camera, will say it doesn&#8217;t look professional!<br />
The one problem, and it&#8217;s a major one, is that many producers are not yet ready for tapeless footage. It&#8217;s still a Beta tape world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-2891</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-2891</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for the coverage fresh DV cru. Little doubt the HPX500 is a camera thats being watched by quite a number of us at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for the coverage fresh DV cru. Little doubt the HPX500 is a camera thats being watched by quite a number of us at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajit</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-2887</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 03:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshdv.com/2007/04/hpx-500-hands-on.html#comment-2887</guid>
		<description>Good podcast. I completely overlooked the news surrounding this camera but watching your video, I am somewhat intrigued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good podcast. I completely overlooked the news surrounding this camera but watching your video, I am somewhat intrigued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
