Quality and Feature Comparisons of Popular Video Sharing Sites
Published by admin December 1st, 2006 in NewsUPDATE: There is a larger and more extensive comparison matrix (draft version) that the author was kind enough to let us know about. This one digs a little deeper.
Techcrunch has compiled a chart that compares features of all the popular “Flickrs of Video”. Handy, if you’re into that sort of thing.
In related news, Life Goggles shares comparisons that show at a glance the disparities in video encoding quality between services. They show results from YouTube, Google Video, MetaCafe, Soapbox, Revver, Blip.tv, MyHeavy, and Vimeo. Coming soon are additional tests that will include the AOL and Myspace video services.
-
About FreshDV
-
Sponsors
-
Recent Comments
- video production on DSLR vs Red vs HPX vs EX1 low light performance comparison
- Ernânio Mandlate on Canon 5D MarkII Dynamic Range Test
- ugg boots on Canon 7D firmware 1.2.2 update fixes aperture bug
- Matthew Jeppsen on Redrock Launches Ops - Camo up your support rig
- Fabdex on Redrock Launches Ops - Camo up your support rig
-
Support FreshDV
You know, that TechCrunch article is more than a year old… :)
…and like a fine wine, it gets better with age. :-)
Good catch.
Thanks for linking to my site. I’m just about to release an ebook of a comparison of 25 video sharing sites, however before then I’ve updated the Techcrunch post with some info of my own. The first rough draft of this can be found here. All comments and suggestions greatfully received!