<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 35mm Lens Adapter Shootout - Cinevate Brevis vs Redrock M2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freshdv.com/2006/12/35mm-lens-adapter-shootout-cinevate.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2006/12/35mm-lens-adapter-shootout-cinevate.html</link>
	<description>Serving up fresh, crispy news and views for creators and consumers of digital video</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kendal Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2006/12/35mm-lens-adapter-shootout-cinevate.html#comment-19642</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendal Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crispyfeeds.com/2006/12/35mm-lens-adapter-shootout-cinevate-brevis-vs-redrock-m2.html#comment-19642</guid>
		<description>Its the link in the article labeled "Gear-Brain took both adapters for a ride" but here you go just in case: http://gearbrain.blogspot.com/2006/11/redrock-m2-vs-cinevate-brevis.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its the link in the article labeled &#8220;Gear-Brain took both adapters for a ride&#8221; but here you go just in case: <a href="http://gearbrain.blogspot.com/2006/11/redrock-m2-vs-cinevate-brevis.html" rel="nofollow">http://gearbrain.blogspot.com/2006/11/redrock-m2-vs-cinevate-brevis.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Render Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2006/12/35mm-lens-adapter-shootout-cinevate.html#comment-19635</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Render Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crispyfeeds.com/2006/12/35mm-lens-adapter-shootout-cinevate-brevis-vs-redrock-m2.html#comment-19635</guid>
		<description>Interested in reading the RedRock/Cinevate comparison article.........
how do I access that please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interested in reading the RedRock/Cinevate comparison article&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
how do I access that please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JVC HD200U and HD250U - Still underrated? at FresHDV</title>
		<link>http://www.freshdv.com/2006/12/35mm-lens-adapter-shootout-cinevate.html#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>JVC HD200U and HD250U - Still underrated? at FresHDV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crispyfeeds.com/2006/12/35mm-lens-adapter-shootout-cinevate-brevis-vs-redrock-m2.html#comment-377</guid>
		<description>[...] Why is it that I never hear anyone talking about the JVC HD200U and HD250U camcorders? About 9 months ago I posted a rant on why they seemed to be under-rated, and they were brand new at that time. Since then I&#8217;ve heard very little in the news about them. From a specs standpoint, they seem like strong models&#8230;24p/60p HDV to tape (12 or 5-frame GOP), HD-SDI 4:2:2 8-bit tether, PL lens mount via the HZ-CA13U adapter (admittedly not cheap at $4,400) and a handy &#8220;Image Inversion&#8221; feature for use with image-flipping 35mm adapters like the Cinevate Brevis or Red Rock M2. Seems like a solid feature set. So who is using the JVC cameras, and why? Who isn&#8217;t, and why not? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why is it that I never hear anyone talking about the JVC HD200U and HD250U camcorders? About 9 months ago I posted a rant on why they seemed to be under-rated, and they were brand new at that time. Since then I&#8217;ve heard very little in the news about them. From a specs standpoint, they seem like strong models&#8230;24p/60p HDV to tape (12 or 5-frame GOP), HD-SDI 4:2:2 8-bit tether, PL lens mount via the HZ-CA13U adapter (admittedly not cheap at $4,400) and a handy &#8220;Image Inversion&#8221; feature for use with image-flipping 35mm adapters like the Cinevate Brevis or Red Rock M2. Seems like a solid feature set. So who is using the JVC cameras, and why? Who isn&#8217;t, and why not? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
